When Control Isn't the Real Issue: Understanding the Hidden Needs of Emotionally Abusive Partners

Author: Michal Peretz | Published on December 1, 2025 | Blog Last Updated on December 1, 2025 | Time: 5:23 AM

So what does Control Mean to a narcissist?

I was listening to a podcast by Jefferson Fisher on How to Talk to Someone You Completely Disagree With, and he talks about de-centering the focus on arguing about their opinion, and focus on finding out what they need, most oftentimes being control or maybe a fear they have on the issue being argued.

My ex's mother gave me warnings such as, "He likes control., which at the time I didn't fully understand what control meant for my ex, and now I do by applying the knowledge of understanding the different types of control.

Control is the primary core need for an abuser, but not for the reasons you think.

There are two kinds of “control” in relationships:

Healthy control:

Trying to keep stability, safety, predictability.

Unhealthy control:

Trying to regulate their internal chaos by destabilizing someone else.

People with narcissistic personality disorder (NPD), emotional abusers, fit in the second category.

This means narcissists doesn’t want control because they are strong, abusers want control because they are emotionally dysregulated and cannot tolerate:

    • Shame
    • Uncertainty
    • Accountability
    • Someone else having needs
    • Someone else being autonomous
    • Someone else not reacting the way he expects
  • What narcissistic abusers “needs” shifts because they themselves are not stable.

    People with narcissistic traits often have internal states that change rapidly. For example, an abuser over time might create emotional dysregulation in others through:

    • Day 1: Wanting closeness
    • Day 2: Then wants distance
    • Day 3: Then wants you to reassure him
    • Day 4: Then wants to punish you
    • Day 5: Then wants you to be silent
    • Day 6: Then wants you to engage
    • Day 7: Then wants to break it off
    • Day 8: Then wants control again
    • Day 9: Then blames you for the fact that they are inconsistent
  • This is because the “need” of an abuser is not a stable adult need, and centered around the need to dysregulate and emotionally destabilize others to feel regulated. It is an injured inner child, cycling through panic and defense. So yes, victims and survivors of abuse, might experience the following behaviors of abusers:

    • Hot → cold
    • Loving → cruel
    • Reassuring → punishing
    • Promising → abandoning
    • Inviting → discarding
  • A Narcissists real need, underneath everything, is:

    Abusers need external validation and regulation of their own emotional instability at your expense.

    Every abusive behavior described aligns with one thing; They need someone else (you or anyone in their external environment) to absorb their:

    • shame
    • fear
    • anger
    • doubt
    • chaos
  • So he projects it onto you.

    Abusers, especially those with personality disorders cannot regulate their own emotions towards themselves or others and intentionally hurt others through destabilizing, confusing, blame-shifting because they need someone to stabilize their internal emotional chaos. Because abusers do not know how to connect, they destabilizes the person who tries to connect with them.

    So what might control look like for a narcissist?

      "He wants control"

    is actually:

      “He wants someone to hold his emotional mess for him.”

    And when you try to set a boundary? He feels abandoned → triggers → lashes out → blames you. This is why nothing ever feels resolved.

    These authors differ in theology and method, but all stress intentional thought as causally potent—bridging metaphysical currents with practical personal development (Atkinson, 1906/1908; Haanel, 1916/1919; Wattles, 1910; Hill, 1937).

    Why do narcissists say you “abuse them,” even when you go silent?

    In the early 2000s, Esther and Jerry Hicks advanced LoA through the “Abraham” teachings, culminating in The Law of Attraction: The Basics of the Teachings of Abraham (2006) and related works that framed deliberate focus and emotional guidance as keys to “allowing” desired outcomes (Hicks & Hicks, 2006). Shortly after, Rhonda Byrne’s documentary and book The Secret (2006) propelled LoA into global mainstream culture, drawing on New Thought texts (e.g., Wattles) and featuring contemporary teachers (New Yorker, 2010). The popularization drew both devoted audiences and critiques that LoA risks oversimplifying structural realities or encouraging self-blame for uncontrollable hardships (New Yorker, 2010).

    Takeaway: The 2000s didn’t invent LoA; they reframed and amplified a 19th–20th-century lineage for the internet, talk-show, and mass-market era (New Yorker, 2010; Britannica, 2025).

    Timeline at a Glance

    Selected Milestones in the Law of Attraction’s Development
    Period Figure / Work Notes & Influence
    Mid–late 1800s New Thought emergence; Phineas Quimby; Prentice Mulford, Your Forces and How to Use Them (1888) Mind-healing, idealism, and “thought as cause” become popular; Mulford elaborates thought-creativity themes (Britannica, 2025; Mulford, 1888/1904).
    1906 William W. Atkinson, Thought Vibration; or, The Law of Attraction in the Thought World Explicit “Law of Attraction” framing; “thoughts are things” and “like attracts like” (Atkinson, 1906/1908).
    1910–1916 W. D. Wattles, The Science of Getting Rich (1910); C. F. Haanel, The Master Key System (1916) Systematized creative thought, visualization, and concentration for success and self-development (Wattles, 1910; Haanel, 1916/1919).
    1928–1937 Napoleon Hill, The Law of Success (1928); Think and Grow Rich (1937) Success psychology mainstreams mind-set, desire, belief, and persistence (Hill, 1937).
    2004–2009 Esther & Jerry Hicks (Abraham) titles incl. The Law of Attraction (2006) Modern spiritual framing of deliberate focus and emotional alignment (Hicks & Hicks, 2006).
    2006 Rhonda Byrne, The Secret (film & book) Global popularization, substantial cultural impact and debate (New Yorker, 2010).

    Key Themes & Legacy

    References

    Atkinson, W. W. (1908). Thought vibration; or, The law of attraction in the thought world. The Library Shelf. (Original work published 1906). https://archive.org/details/thoughtvibratio00atkigoog

    Britannica. (2025, July 28). New Thought. https://www.britannica.com/event/New-Thought

    Byrne, R. (2006). The Secret. Atria Books/Beyond Words. (Context & reception summarized in: Remnick, 2010).

    EBSCO Research Starters. (n.d.). New Thought (religious movement). https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/complementary-and-alternative-medicine/new-thought-religious-movement

    Haanel, C. F. (1919). The master key system. (Original course 1916). https://archive.org/download/masterkeysystem1919haan/masterkeysystem1919haan.pdf

    Hicks, E., & Hicks, J. (2006). The law of attraction: The basics of the teachings of Abraham. Hay House. https://cmc.marmot.org/Record/.b2688835x

    Hill, N. (1937). Think and grow rich. The Ralston Society.

    Mulford, P. (1904). Your forces and how to use them (Vol. 4). White Cross Library. (Original essays 1880s). https://iapsop.com/ssoc/1904__mulford___your_forces_and_how_to_use_them_v4.pdf

    Remnick, D. (2010, September 13). Power lines. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/09/13/power-lines-2

    Wattles, W. D. (1910). The science of getting rich. Elizabeth Towne. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/59844/59844-h/59844-h.htm

    Tags